In September 2025, late-night host Jimmy Kimmel faced significant backlash following comments he made about the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk. Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA, was fatally shot on September 10 at Utah Valley University. The incident sparked national outrage and political discourse, with Kimmel’s remarks becoming a focal point of controversy.
Also read: thesparkshop in clothing men
The Controversial Monologue
During the September 15 episode of Jimmy Kimmel Live!, Kimmel addressed the political reactions to Kirk’s death. He criticized what he perceived as attempts by some in the MAGA movement to politicize the tragedy. Specifically, Kimmel remarked:
“We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them, and doing everything they can to score political points from it.”
He also compared President Donald Trump’s reaction to Kirk’s death to “how a four-year-old mourns a goldfish.”
Immediate Fallout
Kimmel’s comments quickly drew criticism from conservative figures and media outlets. FCC Chairman Brendan Carr condemned the remarks, suggesting that Kimmel had misled viewers about the shooter’s affiliation with the MAGA movement. Carr warned that the FCC could revoke broadcasting licenses of stations airing Kimmel’s show. In response, major broadcasters Nexstar and Sinclair preempted Jimmy Kimmel Live! on their ABC-affiliated stations. ABC subsequently suspended the show indefinitely.
Kimmel’s Defense
In the days following the suspension, Kimmel defended his remarks. He stated that his comments were “intentionally and maliciously mischaracterized” by critics, particularly in right-wing media. Kimmel argued that he was reacting to what he saw as distortions by conservative groups and aimed to correct them.
Upon his return to the airwaves on September 23, Kimmel addressed the controversy, emphasizing that it was never his intention to make light of Kirk’s death. He acknowledged that he can sometimes be reactionary and used the suspension period for reflection, in consultation with Disney executive Dana Walden. Kimmel admitted that the experience helped him understand different perspectives and the importance of considering public perception.
Public Reaction
The incident sparked a broader debate about free speech, political bias, and the role of media in shaping public discourse. While some defended Kimmel’s right to satirize political events, others criticized him for what they perceived as a misrepresentation of facts. The controversy highlighted the deepening political divisions in the United States and the challenges faced by media figures in navigating these tensions.
Conclusion
Jimmy Kimmel’s comments about Charlie Kirk’s assassination and the subsequent political reactions led to significant controversy and a temporary suspension of his show. While Kimmel defended his remarks as a response to what he saw as distortions by conservative groups, the incident underscored the complexities of political discourse in the media landscape. As the situation continues to evolve, it serves as a reminder of the power of media in shaping public perception and the responsibility that comes with it.
